The appeal is registered Writ Appeal WA 886/2025, IPR classification.

I filed the following Writ Appeal with High court of Karnataka, on 2-6-2025, which is given FR No. 820/2025 (WA). The Writ Appeal was filed, including the full copy of Writ Petition WP 13823/2023, with the first volume of the Writ Petition stitched with the Writ Appeal, and the rest of the Writ Petition volumes, in stacks of total 10 volumes each, were filed with the court in two sets filed at the court counter, and in two sets delivered to respondent, at the ASG, Additional Solicitor General office at the High court of Karnataka premises.

Volume 1 of WA 13823 / 2023 stitched with the Writ Appeal, with replaced sheets 22-40, with office objection corrections.

Index for other volumes stitched with the Writ Appeal.

The other volumes of WP 13823/2023, are files you can access from the website weblink https://srinivasdevathi.com/writ-petition-for-execution-of-62-sale-agreements/.

The Filing receipt with court seal, and the court fee paid receipt are attached here.

Activity on 11-6-2025

The following ‘Memo under order XXVII, rule 6 of CPC’ was filed with the Honorable court. I request everyone to read this memo in detail.

Activity on 12-6-2025

The Party in person committee meeting was scheduled for 3pm. I attended the meeting. They asked a few questions which I answered. I referred to articles of constitution of India, articles 21, 51A, the fact about invoking my inherent rights in this Writ Appeal. I referred to the pages in the memo of the Writ Appeal, where these articles are cited, and the included details in the ‘Grounds’ section, elaborated by each of the prayer point. I indicated that I wanted to move the memo in the court on 13-6-2025. The meeting ended with their ‘verbal confirmation’ that I can go ahead and move memo in the Honorable court, for the Writ Appeal.

Activity on 13-6-2025

I went to court hall 2, where the Honorable acting Chief Justice is presiding. The Honorable Justice asked a few questions about the Writ Appeal, which I answered, and subsequently he directed that I address the office objections and return, so that the Writ Appeal could be moved in the court.

Afternoon at 2:30pm, I went to WA Scrutiny, and gave the following Written submission addressing the list of office objections. The WA Scrutiny read through the entire written submission, and accepted the same. Along with this written submission, I got few pages in annexure EE1 of WP, of one of the court copy, stitched horizontally in one volume, and complied with the office objection 9. I used WP, for Writ Petition, and WA, for Writ Appeal through the Written Statement.

WRITTEN SUBMISSION. My written statement for office objections posted online dated 9-6-2025.

1. High court of Karnataka is my original and appellate jurisdiction.
2. E-mail ID is accurate, and is a subject of WP 24623/2024 like explained in WA.
3. 3 and 4. Prayer points table provided for comparison. Prayer for giving orders directly to IB, WIPO, with me introducing the Macro Economic reform Project Earthling©, my authored work, addressing the WIPO assembly.
5. Verifying affidavit is accurate.
6. It was allowed in the past. Impugned orders are annexure A.
7. WP volume 1 stitched after WA annexures, form A, form B, and is followed by index, rest of the volumes, memos including annexures.
8. They are marked according to description.
9. In annexure FF of WP, all pages are portrait orientation. For annexure EE1 of WP, complied.
10. Index of all WP volumes, and memos are stitched with WA.
11. Supporting and substantiating documents submitted with WA, and not additional documents.
12. No additional documents submitted, only supporting and substantiating documents submitted.
13. With so many volumes for WP, I avoided splitting the WA into two volumes. Kindly allow.
14. Form A is page 435. Form B is pages 436-438.
15. This WA is filed following WA 983/2024 which was disposed, dismissed for non compliance of office objections, and not on point of law, and Patent Cooperation Treaty. This WA is filed by complying those list of office objections, and for the full legal resolution of ’cause of action’, execution of 62 sale agreements.
16. With the QR code, I submitted the order copy from High court of Karnataka website. A certified copy could be produced within few weeks. Certified copies application placed.
17. Index is present for all volumes, like explained in verifying affidavit.
18. The annexures B-T are clearly described in the Writ Appeal memo.
19. Stitched with the Writ Appeal, are the Index of all volumes and memos.

Bengaluru, 13-6-2025. My Signature, Appellant and party in person.

Office objection 13 and my written submission for 13, were discussed with WA Scrutiny SO, I requested that it be allowed. The Section Officer accepted. I further stated that if the Honorable Justice orders that it be split into two volumes, I shall comply.

Activity on 17-6-2025

I went to court hall 2, indicated that I complied with listed office objections according to the direction of Honorable acting Chief Justice, and presented the ‘Memo under order XXVII, rule 6 of CPC’, and requested the WA file be brought to the court, for grant of Interim relief orders, and orders for ‘Memo under order XXVII, rule 6 of CPC’ for hearing from Mrs. Uma Sekhar on the questions and discussion subjects. The Honorable acting Chief Justice stated the WA must be listed first, and when I presented the ‘Memo for posting’, the WA was listed for 8-7-2025. With reference to annexure S, I wanted to hand over two pepsi bottles, and with reference to annexure T, I wanted to hand over at least one of the two laptops, however the Honorable acting Chief Justice did not provide direction on this subject, indicating this must be taken up when the WA is listed, on 8-7-2025. This is also indicative of the fact that we do not possess advanced labs to deal with ‘serum technology packages usage’, and investigating intrusive spyware at operating system level, in favor of, me building the necessary skillset in India, by organizing STE Bank and organizing STUN.

Activity on 19-6-2025

In response to a telephonic communication from WA Scrutiny on 17-6-2025, requesting clarification about the ‘Memo filed under order XXVII, rule 6 of CPC’, the following written submission was given.

20. With reference of the ‘Memo filed under order XXVII, rule 6 of CPC’, on 11-6-2025, and given the following facts,

• Extremely high valued patent, my ‘Invention systems and methods’,
• Breach of Patent Cooperation Treaty, signed by 158 World countries,
• My patent connected with 62 countries directly,
• Project Earthling© must be introduced by me at WIPO assembly addressing 193 World country delegates, it is essential, and required to have Mrs. Uma Sekhar, additional secretary of Legal and Treaties Division, Ministry of External Affairs, the person able to answer the questions, to attend the court hearings and answer the ‘questions relating the suit’, and the discussion subjects listed in the memo relating the Interim prayer points O-DD, and prayer points A-N. I also indicate that there is urgency to hear from Mrs. Uma Sekhar, since Honorable court issued orders for ‘Issuing the consent letter’ on 14-6-2024, with a due date of 14-12-2024. And WP 13823/2023 with the ‘Interim relief prayer’ was filed on 30-6-2023.

Bengaluru, 19-6-2025. My Signature, Srinivas S. Devathi, Appellant, and party in person.

Activity on 27-6-2025

With reference to WA Scrutiny summary list number 16. CERTIFIED COPY OF WP ORDER TO BE PRODUCED, and according to telephonic discussion with them, I replaced the ‘order copy from High court of Karnataka website’, with the certified copy of ‘Impugned orders issued for WP 13823/2023, dated 14-6-2024’, annexure A. Mutatis mutandis action for ‘orders issued by Honorable court for WP 12356/2023, dated 14-6-2024’, annexure B. This replacement was for the first court copy of Writ Appeal, which was stitched with the certified copies and handed over to the WA Scrutiny office.

WA is listed on 8-7-2025.