In the image you see the timeline of Srinivas Devathi’s inventions.
Srinivas Devathi’s work and inventions triggered global events and activities. Here is an image showing the timeline of triggered emotions and events in USA and UK.
How my Inventions happened. A write up on source to creativity and inventiveness – Srinivas Devathi
To all media houses; to all law firms; everyone:
I had sent a document dated April 28, 2018; and some e-mail communications around that date about ‘How the inventions happened’. In that document, I speak off a two stage / two phase approach to my inventions; in an Inception and then Conception phase. However, I must say after much introspection, the Inception phase is a non-existent phase. It is just the Conception point, which is the Eureka moment when the invention happens; solving a particular problem. You must note, an invention always solves a problem and only when it does, will it have any market potential, business potential or revenue and income viability. I make this statement because typically for an invention to happen (solve a problem), there is a lot of earlier information, data, knowledge a person needs to have which kind of elaborates to multiple inception points / multiple data points of knowledge. Without all this prior information, knowledge and data, one will never be able to solve a problem or have a Eureka moment. Hence, this document about ‘How the inventions have happened’ overrides the earlier communications (of mine) about ‘How inventions happened’. I shall disclose the same to media houses when I formally talk about this and certainly there will be books written about this subject in detail as well.
In my case, most of my inventions have happened when I was trying to solve a problem that I was facing resulting in the invention. Among other inventions which could be called as accidental inventions by some (which happened when I was not consciously trying to solve a problem), by a process called “Thought crystallization or thought culmination, resulting in the Eureka moment”.
A simple way of explaining this is; a farmer is very unlikely to solve a mechanical engineering problem or come up with new Electronic system invention. Similarly, a computer science student is unlikely to come up with new economics theories / practices. You get the message / theme.
Essentially, there must be foundational knowledge pertaining to the field you invent in or have a Eureka moment in. The foundational knowledge comes by learning, studying the subject or at least capturing relevant information in the field / subject by your reading practices.
At some point all the information you have, all knowledge you have, all data you have, all thoughts from the data and knowledge, content you have (which could be everything you have studied in your school, College, read in papers, magazines, captured as information via news or other medium, etc.); might culminate in you solving a problem or having the Eureka moment (when you are not trying to solve a problem). Without the content, it is unlikely that you will ever solve a problem, invent anything, or have a Eureka moment.
My study in field of Mechanical engineering was prerequisite for my Vehicle Color Change Technology invention in Q1 (Quarter one) of 2007.
Lot of reading about businesses / corporate world / economics through papers, magazines and following them regularly was the prerequisite for authoring Project Earthling© and United Nations Global Governance Model 2020©; so that the 93 Trillion deal is enabled and completed. I authored this content when I was trying to solve the problem or answer the question ‘How do I enable the largest deal in the world covering many country IP rights to my invention of ‘Vehicle Color Change Technology’?’.
I endorse ‘Thought crystallization’ / ‘Thought culmination’ resulting in the Eureka moment; with the required knowledge to achieve the same; as the final core reason for inventiveness and creativity. However, it must be clearly understood that the following two scenarios are fairly normal in the World. A scholar with a lot of knowledge and information in one field may not be creative enough to deliver an invention or solve a problem. And at the same time, a naturally creative person may not have knowledge, required information in any field to come up with an invention or solve a problem.
Srinivas S. Devathi, Serial Inventor, Oct 27th ,2019; Bangalore, India.